![]() #9 got benchmark programm data, about to get FAL images +0.01s. #8 Created sortOrder for cached benchmark data +0s. #7 Loaded cached benchmark data tx_nbc2_cpu_cache_values +0s. #6 found 4689 cached benchmark values +0.03s. Simply compare the read and write performance of the other drives. (In most cases, the default selection is more than sufficient.) Step 4: Select the drive (HDD or SSD) you want to test. In terms of performance, the SSD is returning some pretty good results to us. (If the default is 5, you can change it to 3, which should be enough to get more accurate results.) Step 3: Select the file size. #5 Loaded cached specs data from 17:39:31 = 3861.5h +0.04s. Step 1: Launch CrystalDiskMark to access its interface. #4 Cache table found with all needed fields in it! +0s. #3 Cache table for values found, checking fields. # started gpulist at took 0s on source +0s. Model Codename Series L2 Cache 元 Cache FSB / QPI TDP Watt MHz Turbo Cores Threads Process (nm) Architecture 64 Bit Days old Graphics Card all, noneģDMark06 CPU Cinebench R10 32Bit Single Cinebench R10 32Bit Multi Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit Cinebench R11.5 64Bit Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit Cinebench R20 Single Cinebench R20 Cinebench R23 Single Core Cinebench R23 Multi Core SuperPI 1M* SuperPI 32M* wPrime 32 wPrime 1024 WinRAR 4.0 x264 Pass 1 x264 Pass 2 x265 TrueCrypt AES TrueCrypt Twofish TrueCrypt Serpent Blender 7-Zip Single 7-Zip Geekbench 2 Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core Score Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core Score Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core Score Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core Score Geekbench 5.0 5.0 Single-Core Geekbench 5.0 5.0 Multi-Core Geekbench 5.4 Single-Core Geekbench 5.4 Multi-Core PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests Sunspider 1.0 Total Score Octane V2 Total Score Jetstream 2 Speedometer WebXPRT 3 all, none TDP W Cores Threads ArchitectureĪnnounced at least months ago (>0) Show only items with known benchmark results Still available (not archived) Show benchmark bars Show single scores on hover Show Percent Perf. Simply compare the read and write performance of the other drives.(Manufacturer, Model, Series, Codename), Connect search words with and or . ![]() In terms of performance, the SSD is returning some pretty good results to us. It is very useful for doing a quick sanity check on your storage performance. You can give it a shot for free because it is available for download. CrystalDiskMark is a relatively quick and dirty disk benchmark utility that is very easy to use. Benchmark Results: CrystalDiskMark As mentioned before, CrystalDiskMark is a handy tool when you just want a quick idea of raw throughput performance. It also supports different types of test data (Random, 0 Fill, 1 Fill), has basic theme support, and supports multilingual input. When it comes to reads and writes, CrystalDiskMark can measure sequential reads and writes as well as random reads and writes of 512 KB, 4 KB, 4 KB (Queue Depth = 32) size. ![]() It is handy for evaluating the speed of different storage devices, both portable and local storage. The exception is at QD1, although performance is still relatively good. CrystalDiskMark is a freeware disk benchmark utility. CDM’s sequential results indicate that the 990 Pro is better than the 980 Pro and generally it fares well. ![]() It is a disk benchmark application that assesses the performance of sequential and random read/write operations of varying sizes on any storage medium.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |